Giuliani on Gun Registration
In case you were wondering:
This article is permanently linked here.
2 comments
The Musings of Milkey
Filling the Internet Void with Ramblings of Politics and Sexual Innuendo
Friday, June 01, 2007
Recurring Series
Ohio 2006 Ballot IssuesWho's Schmoozing Me Now?
What Really Grinds My Gears
Blogs Worth Checking Out
The Francis BlogThe Allburn Blog
Sarcastically Yours
Mistake by the Lake Times
The Dilbert Blog
Sites Worth Checking Out
Ohioans For Concealed CarryNRA News
Previous Posts
- I must be good luck
- Ohio Rep Becomes Pro-Gun after Armed Attack
- Economics of the Oil Industry
- Help me settle an argument
- Have You Seen This?
- And it continues...
- I love you, YouTube
- GOP Debate
- Tribe Screwed Out of Yet Another Win
- I'm Not Saying Anything...
2 Comments:
Do you have a problem with that policy as it relates to handguns?
It seems sensible enough.
Yes, handgun registration would be a very bad thing. There's no waffling on that in the firearms community.
As Andy and I discuss, there are two ways to discuss the "gun debate": logically and legally. Arguments can be made that registration can not be allowed that addresses both of those areas:
Logically - Without failure, every single weapon confiscation was preceded by registration. Mao, Hitler, England, Australia, Darfur, etc, etc... Every single one.
Legally - It is preposterous to compare registering automobiles to registering arms. That's because there is no inherent (some would say God-given) right to drive a car that the US Constitution addresses. The Constitution does address the ownership of firearms. The Supreme Court has continually said that gun registration is unConstitutional.
Post a Comment
<< Home